Saturday, March 10, 2012

Seeking your provisions (rizq)

At any Muslim family gathering, a favourite topic (amongst the men at least) is how best to go about accumulating more wealth. When in attendance at such gatherings, I have often been advised, which stocks and shares to invest in or which riba (interest) based mortgages to enter into. Ironically, those advising me to commit flagrant transgressions against Allah (swt) in an attempt to become more wealthy, were Muslims!

Islam teaches us that a man should go and earn his living, and this is a noble act in the eyes of Allah (swt). Most of us have several responsibilities, be they to our parents, our children, or both. There are always bills to pay.

Rizq

We know through the forewarning of Allah (swt) that we must use only allowed (halal) means in the pursuit of wealth. Why then do some Muslims persist in pursuing their wealth through prohibited (haram) means? Much can be attributed to man’s weakness, and desire for immediate gratification and comfort, which lead to his short sightedness. In turn much of this weakness is attributable to a weakness in understanding certain concepts from Islam, and the widely misunderstood concept of rizq.

How many times have we come across a Muslim man who does not go to pray jumuah salat on Friday although it is an obligation on him. His argument is “if I go to jumuah, , I may not be seen as a hard worker so I may loose my job. If I loose my job, I will not be able to provide for my family.” So his misunderstanding about the source of his provisions has lead him to disobey Allah (swt) by missing jumuah prayers.

Rizq is from Allah

Allah (swt) said:

“Say: ‘Truly my Lord enlarges the provision (rizq) for whom He will of His slaves, and (also) restricts (it) for him, and whatever you spend of anything (in Allah’s cause), He will replace it. And He is the best of providers’” [TMQ Saba: 39].

It is part of the aqeedah (belief) of a Muslim that his sustenance and wealth (his rizq) is given to him by Allah (swt). One of Allah’s names is Ar-Razzaq or The Provider. Rizq includes everything provided by way of provision or nurture, including both monetary wealth, food and any sustenance. The references to rain, and fruit in some ayahs of Qur’an that talk about rizq, demonstrate that the concept of rizq is more general than gold, silver or money alone, but encompasses all provision.

Rizq is fixed

Another crucial point to understanding rizq is that it is fixed in its amount. That is the rizq for each and every human has already been decreed by Allah (swt).

Ibn Mas’ud narrated that Allah’s Messenger (saw) said to his wife Umm Habiba: “Verily you have asked Allah about the duration of life already set, and the steps you would take, and the sustenance the share of which is fixed. Nothing will take place before its due time, and nothing will be deferred beyond when it is due.” [Muslim].

These two concepts from the Islamic aqeedah (belief) mark a believer as being distinctive from the kuffar. The belief that his wealth is provided by Allah is in conflict with the widely held belief that it is the individual through his own efforts or job who provides rizq for himself. Secondly this allocation is fixed and unchangeable despite our efforts to increase it. This is also a distinct view. Together they provide a variety of unique effects.

Muslims believe in rizq because it is contained in the miraculous text of the Qur’an and explained in the sunnah of Allah’s Messenger, as well as it being something we can appreciate by studying the reality around us. Some confusion may arise when attempting to understand its application in everyday life, after all a hot shot financial analyst surrounded by all the trappings of 21st century life has so much wealth because of his work and his pay cheque, as compared to a lowly farmer in the developing world and his humble surroundings. Actually it is perfectly demonstrable that the difference in rizq is beyond the control of man and is the work of divine providence.

What we control

It is easily understood that there is a sphere in which men have been granted control by Allah (swt) i.e. our words and our chosen actions. It is also self evident that there is a sphere which is beyond the influence of man, and which Allah as the Master of creation controls all - the weather, if a flipped coin lands heads or tail - so called ‘luck’, and generally everything man has no control over.

People often confuse the circumstances by which we attain our rizq with the actual of cause of rizq. If these circumstances such as our profession were the true causes of rizq then they should not fail in producing a particular amount of rizq, but it can clearly be seen that they do not guarantee the rizq. These circumstances may exist but the individual for some reason doesn’t gain the expected income. On the other hand someone may be uneducated, unemployed and poor but becomes a millionaire overnight for some reason such as winning a competition, inheriting wealth, etc. If circumstances such as status, education and profession were determining factors of rizq then this would not be the case.

An employee might work for a whole month but he is prevented from his expected income due to settling a previous debt, or spending money on those whose maintenance he is obliged to provide, or by paying taxes. In such a situation, the circumstance which brings the provision (i.e. the employee's work), the rizq was not obtained since he did not get his wages. On the other hand, there might be someone in his house in tower hamlets, to whom the postman brings the news that so and so relative of his in America has died, leaving him as the sole inheritor, and that all of his wealth will pass into his hands. This rizq came to him even though he didn’t imagine it ever becoming so wealthy.

Wealth can come to us in many ways and leave us in many ways. One may inherit wealth, or find it - like hidden treasure in a pirate story or a ten pound note on the street. One may be made redundant, or be given a raise, robbed of all one’s wealth by a highwayman or conned by a grifter. These are only a few scenarios from a long list of possibilities that happen to people every day, some unable to gain the income they worked for and others obtaining wealth without working for it. Therefore the circumstances in which rizq is obtained are as a rule, conditions of rizq and not its causes.

Simply put, it is not within our control to choose how wealthy we are, otherwise we could all will ourselves to be millionaires and own properties in Mayfair. This does not mean we go to the extreme of leaving our work and obligation to ourselves and our family as this would be disobeying the laws of Allah (swt). Rather we do the best actions we can (as providence usually favours the prepared), but with the firm belief that provision is from Allah (swt) alone. The Prophet (saw) advised a man, “Tie the camel and trust in Allah”.

This teaches us that we need to look after the means within our control but must continuously trust in Allah (swt). Islam doesn’t promote fatalism or laziness, it was narrated that Umar bin Al-Khattab (ra) passed by some people, who were known as readers of the Qur’an. He saw them sitting and bending their heads, and asked who they were. He was told: "They are those who depend (al-mutawwakiloon) upon Allah (SWT)." Umar replied: "No, they are the eaters who eat the people’s properties. Do you want me to describe those who really depend upon Allah (al-mutawwakiloon) are?" He was answered in the affirmative, and then he said: "He is the person who throws the seeds in the earth and depends on His Lord The Almighty, The Exalted (‘azza wa jalla)."


In difficult times

A Muslim must always rely upon Allah (swt), this belief gives the believer the strength to overcome difficulties. Someone with the correct understanding that his provision is from Allah (swt), will trust fully in Allah (swt) to provide for him especially when times are difficult.

Allah (swt) said: “Allah increases the provision (rizq) for whom he wills, and straitens (it from whom He wills), and they rejoice in the life of the world, whereas the life of this world as compared with the hereafter is but a brief passing enjoyment” [TMQ Ar-Ra’d: 26].

So if times are difficult the true believer sees it as a test from Allah (swt), and it is He (swt) who will provide what is due. We take heed in what the ayah states that the life of this world “…is but a brief passing enjoyment.”

Confronted with difficult times, another may be tempted in desperation to resort to prohibited (haram) means such as stealing, fraud or taking out an interest bearing loan. There is no such temptation for the steadfast believer who understands that his rizq is from Allah (swt) and he just needs to go out and try his best to earn it in a permitted (halal) way.

The prohibited choices are many, stocks and shares in PLC companies, prohibited mortgages to become landlords or other usurious means, many of which Muslims have delved into, to their great loss.

One failure is the failure to understand their rizq comes from Allah (swt) alone. In believing they have increased their allotment through their choice they are actually deceived, because the only matter they controlled was their choice to do something forbidden and hateful in the eyes of Allah (swt) or not. We should realise that the rizq allotted by Allah (swt) for us will come to us whether we undertake haram or halal actions to obtain it, it is our loss if we follow the path towards jahannam (hell fire) chasing after wealth which has been predestined for us. The great scholar Nu’man ibn Thabit, otherwise known as Abu Hanifah explained this point when he asked a thief why he is stealing from his own rizq i.e. stealing to obtain something which he would come to him anyway.


Value of wealth

One final quality of the believer who has understood rizq in its correct context, is the small value he places upon his wealth, or rather the value he places upon it is of a different type. He knows it is a burden, he knows his provision is fixed and that Allah (swt) will provide for him so there is no need to fear in spending his wealth freely in a righteous manner, as these deeds will benefit him in the hereafter whereas the material wealth he accumulates and the items he has bought with them and covets will not.

A pure understanding, well thought out and free from doubt, of key notions like rizq, the value of deeds and the insignificance of this dunya (wordly life), causes a believer to be freed from the struggle to accumulate wealth to purchase the next best thing and places his focus upon actions instead. It will also produce an individual who sticks to the shariah rules when obtaining wealth and someone who is characterised with generosity, actively seeking useful ways to spend or invest his wealth which will benefit him through earning Allah’s pleasure. Compare this to the struggle of most people to save for a faster car, a bigger house, or the finest fashions.

“Verily Allah provides sustenance to whom He wills.” [TMQ al-Imran: 37]....

Working towards establishing the Islamic Khilafah is an individual duty that requires utmost effort and utmost speed

Working towards establishing the Islamic State that rules by what Allah (SWT) has revealed is in essence a duty of sufficiency (Fardhu Kifayah). However, since the sufficiency is not fulfilled despite the efforts of those who work towards it, the duty expands until it includes every Muslim.  This is the case in every duty of sufficiency.

The evidence about the obligation of working towards the establishment of the Islamic State is conclusive in text and in meaning, hence, whoever denies it is a Kafir.  As for he who acknowledges this fact but does not work towards it, he is sinful.  This evidence is reflected in the text which commands the Muslims to abide by and refer their affairs to the Islamic Shari’ah.  It is also reflected in the texts which forbid the Muslims from referring their affairs to other than the Islamic Shari’ah:  Allah (SWT) says: ‘As for the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands.’ [5 - 38] T.M.Q.  He (SWT) says: ‘The woman and the man guilty of fornication lash each of them a hundred lashes.’ [24 - 2] T.M.Q.

Allah (SWT) says: ‘They wish to refer in judgement to Taghut (the evil one) and they had been ordered to reject him…’ [4 - 60] T.M.Q.  Allah (SWT) also says: ‘No by your God, they shall not have total belief until they make you judge in what is in dispute between them.’ [4 - 65] T.M.Q. And there are many other Shari’ah text to that effect.  Hence, the largest part of the Shari’ah rules would be suspended in the absence of an Islamic State, and the Ummah is responsible for this.

As for the fact that this action must be undertaken by every Muslim and with his utmost capability, this is also conclusive in text and in meaning, and whoever denies it would be Kafir, and he who neglects it would be sinful.  The evidence is obtained from the text which have come to confirm and establish this meaning; Allah (SWT) says: ‘So fear Allah as much as you can.’ [27 - 93] T.M.Q.

He (SWT) also says: ‘On no soul does Allah place a burden greater than it can bear.’ [2 - 86] T.M.Q.  This means that a person should give the utmost of his ability, not the half, nor the minimum.  And when He (SWT) says: ‘So fear Allah as much as you can.’ [22 - 73] T.M.Q. i.e. one should fear and obey Allah (SWT) to the maximum of his ability, not half of it. When a Muslim witnesses the Munkarat (evil deeds) around him, he is ordered to change them by the utmost of his ability, not part of his ability, for the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘He who witnesses a Munkar, let him change it by his hand, if he could not, then by his tongue, and if he could not, then by his heart, and this would be the least amount of Iman.’  The phrase of  ‘if he could not’ indicates that if he used the utmost of his ability and could not change the Munkar.

Some people may fail to differentiate between the work towards establishing the Khilafah and establishing it immediately.  They may say: ‘We cannot remove the existing regime and establish the Khilafah State in its place’, and since we cannot, we are therefore not commissioned with this duty because Allah (SWT) does not burden a soul with more than it could bear.  This saying could only result from ignorance or from malice and deception.  In order to dissipate this misunderstanding, we say: If the group working towards establishing the Khilafah could achieve this immediately, it would not be allowed to delay it.  If it could not achieve this immediately, then it should work, multiply its efforts and strengthen itself further in order to fulfill this task even after a while.  Hence, he who could not achieve a task immediately, he should thrive with his utmost ability to achieve it whenever he could.

Furthermore, why do we say: ‘we cannot ?’ This matter is not requested from one single person, nor is it requested from one single party, nor a single group, nor a single country.  It is by Shari’ah, demanded from the whole of the Islamic Ummah, Arabs and non Arabs alike, and it is at present an individual duty upon every Muslim. Hence, is the Islamic Ummah really unable to fulfill this duty ? or is she slack, neglectful and sinful due to the influence of the Western culture and the influence of the governments’ scholars, the hypocrites?

Also, when we say that it is at present an individual duty upon every Muslim to work towards establishing the Islamic State with the utmost capability, this means that he should forsake many of the permitted actions and many of the recommended (Mandoub) actions if these distracted him from performing this duty.  A Muslim should work to earn his living and to support his dependents.  This is an individual duty upon him.  Carrying the da’awah in order to establish the Khilafah is also an individual duty upon him at present.  So which of the two duties takes precedence over the other?  Shari’ah also demands of the Muslim to perform all the duties. However when these duties throng together, so that if he performed some of them he would not have time to perform the other duties, in this case it is Shari’ah itself that decides which of the duties he should put forward and which duties he should defer. Hence, the issue is a Shari’ah one and not down to whim and desire.  The people of knowledge and Ijtihad are capable and competent when it comes to understanding the priorities.  In this context, to earn a living takes precedence over working towards establishing Khilafah when the two duties clash.  However, the earning of one’s living that takes precedence over the work towards establishing the Khilafah would be the earning of the basic needs, not the luxuries.  Hence, if the Muslim were working and earning enough to cover his basic needs, he would not after that be allowed to take another work to secure the luxuries if this work would prevent him from carrying the da’awah to establish the Khilafah.

Most of the time, work does not prevent the Muslim from carrying the da’awah, for as long as he works amongst people, he could carry the da’awah to them while working.

It is not a valid Shari’ah excuse for the Muslim to say: I cannot work towards establishing the Khilafah because this would lead to my dismissal from work, or my imprisonment: this is so because the Muslim should not continue in the work that lands him into sin.  Just as the Muslim is forbidden from earning from intoxicants, usury, bribery or cheating. Likewise, he is forbidden from earning a living by supporting a system of Kufr or by keeping silent over a system of Kufr.

As for the work towards establishing the Khilafah with utmost speed, this also is conclusive in text and in meaning.  This is so because the Shari’ah rules revealed by Allah (SWT) became applicable the moment they are conveyed; when the rule of shifting the direction of the Qiblah from Bayt-ul-Maqdis to the Sacred Mosque was revealed, those who were praying at the time did turn immediately towards the Ka’abah.  Hence, the rules are in principle for immediate implementation unless they were an evidence allowing relaxation in implementing a certain rule.  Hence, when Allah (SWT) says: ‘O you people fear your God’ [4 - 1] T.M.Q.  and when the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘He who witnesses a Munkar, let him change it…’, these commands are for immediate implementation, and so are the commands related to the establishment of the Hudud (penal code), the judiciary system, carrying the da’awah to the world by way of Jihad, protecting the frontiers and implementing the Shari’ah rules upon the subjects.  All these commands must be implemented immediately.  Furthermore, the Muslims are forbidden from remaining for more than three days without a Khalifah who implements the Shari’ah.  The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘And he who dies without a baya’a (pledge of allegiance) on his neck dies a death of Jahiliyyah.’

Therefore, there is no excuse whatsoever for he who says: ‘I shall work towards establishing the Islamic State, but only after I graduate from University’ or says: ‘After I finish the project I am working on at present.’ Or anything similar, because carrying the da’awah must be undertaken immediately if this were possible: to neglect it would be sinful.

What is most important when working towards establishing the Khilafah is explaining this concept to the Muslims and making them perceive it until it becomes part of the axioms known from Islam by necessity.  While explaining this to them, the hearts of the Muslims should be also charged with the Islamic emotions which drive them to work, persevere and sacrifice.  Allah (SWT) says: ‘O you who believe answer the call of Allah and His Messenger when He calls you to that which gives you life.’ [8 - 24] T.M.Q....

Sunday, March 4, 2012

دل کی لگن - مولانا سید ابو الا علٰی مودودی


مجاہدہ فی سبیل اللہ کے لیے ایک صفت دل کی لگن ہے۔ محض دماغی طور پر ہی کسی   شخص کا تحریک کو سمجھ لینا اور اس پر صرف عقلاً مطمئن ہوجانا، یہ اس راہ میں اقدام کے لیے صرف ایک ابتدائی قدم ہے۔ لیکن اتنے سے تاثر سے کام نہیں چل سکتا ۔ یہاں تو اس کی ضرورت ہے کہ دل میں ایک آگ بھڑک اُٹھے ۔ زیادہ نہیں تو کم از کم اتنی آگ تو شعلہ زن ہونی چاہیے ، جتنی اپنے بچے کو بیمار دیکھ کر ہوجاتی ہے ، اور  آپ کو کھینچ کر ڈاکٹر کے پاس لے جاتی ہے ۔ یا اتنی جتنی گھر میں غلہ نہ پا کر بھڑکتی ہے اور آدمی کو تگ و دو میں مجبور کردیتی ہے اور چین سے نہیں بیٹھنے دیتی ۔ سینوں میں وہ جزبہ ہونا چاہیے جو ہر وقت آپ کو اپنے نصب العین کی دُھن میں لگائے رکھے ، دل و دماغ کو یکسو کردے اور توجہات کو اس کام پر مرکوز کردے کہ اگر ذاتی یا خانگی یا دوسرے غیر مطعلق معاملات کبھی آپ کی توجہ کو اپنی طرف کھینچیں بھی تو آپ سخت نا گواری سے ان کی طرگ کھنچیں۔ کوشش کیجئے کہ اپنی ذات کے لیے قوت اور وقت کا کم سے کم حصہ صرف کریں اور آپ کی زیادہ سے زیادہ جدو جہد اپنے مقصدِ حیات کے لیے ہو ۔ جب تک دل کی لگن نہ ہوگی اور آپ ہمہ تن اپنے آپ کو اس کام میں نہ چھونک دیں گے ، محض زبانی جمع خرچ سے کچھ نہ بنے گا ۔ بیشتر لوگ دماغی طورہمارا ساتھ دینے پر آمادہ ہوجاتے ہیں لیکن کم لوگ ایسے ملتے ہیں جو دل کی لگن کے ساتھ تن من دھن سے اس کام میں شریک ہوں ۔۔۔۔۔ 
جہاں دل کی لگن ہوتی ہے وہاں کسی ٹھیلنے اور اکسانے والے کی ضرورت نہیں رہتی ۔ اس قوت کے ہوتے ہوئے یہ صورتِ حال کبھی پیدا نہیں ہوسکتی کہ اگر کہیں جماعت کا ایک رکن پیچھے ہٹ گیا یا نقلِ مقام پر مجبور ہوگیا تو وہاں کا سارا کام جوپت ہوگیا۔ بخلاف اس کے ہر شخص اس طرح کام کرے گا جس طرح وہ اپنے بچے کو بیمار پا کر کرتا ہے

Nafsiya: Chapter 1 - Hastening to adhere to the Sharī’ah

The following is the translation of a chapter of the book 'The Essential Elements of the Islamic Disposition (Nafsiyah)' issued by Hizb ut Tahrir and published in Beirut, Lebanon in 1425 AH.

He (swt) said:
]وَسَارِعُوا إِلَى مَغْفِرَةٍ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ وَجَنَّةٍ عَرْضُهَا السَّمَاوَاتُ وَالأَرْضُ أُعِدَّتْ لِلْمُتَّقِينَ. [
“And march forth in the way (which leads to) forgiveness from your Lord, and for Paradise as wide as are the heavens and the earth, prepared for Al-Muttaqeen (the pious).” [TMQ Aali ‘Imrān: 133]
He (swt) said:
]إِنَّمَا كَانَ قَوْلَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذَا دُعُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَهُمْ أَنْ يَقُولُوا سَمِعْنَا وَأَطَعْنَا وَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمْ الْمُفْلِحُونَوَمَنْ يُطِعْ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَيَخْشَ اللَّهَ ويتَّقْهِ فَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الْفَائِزُونَ. [
“The only saying of the faithful believers, when they are called to Allah (His Words, the Qur’ān) and His Messenger, to judge between them, is that they say: “We hear and we obey.” And such are the prosperous ones (who will live forever in Paradise). And whosoever obeys Allah and His Messenger, fears Allah, and keeps his duty (to Him), such are the successful ones.” [TMQ An-Nūr: 51-52]
He (swt) said:
]وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَلاَ مُؤْمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَمْرًا أَنْ يَكُونَ لَهُمْ الْخِيَرَةُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِمْ وَمَنْ يَعْصِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ ضَلاَلاً مُبِينًا. [
 “It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.” [TMQ Al-Ahzāb: 36]
He (swt) said:
]فَلاَ وَرَبِّكَ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ حَتَّى يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ لاَ يَجِدُوا فِي أَنفُسِهِمْ حَرَجًا مِمَّا قَضَيْتَ وَيُسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا. [
“But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission.” [TMQ An-Nisā: 65]
He (swt) said:
]يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا قُوا أَنفُسَكُمْ وَأَهْلِيكُمْ نَارًا وَقُودُهَا النَّاسُ وَالْحِجَارَةُ عَلَيْهَا مَلاَئِكَةٌ غِلاَظٌ شِدَادٌ لاَ يَعْصُونَ اللَّهَ مَا أَمَرَهُمْ وَيَفْعَلُونَ مَا يُؤْمَرُونَ. [
 “O you who believe! Ward off from yourselves and your families a Fire (Hell) whose fuel is men and stones, over which are (appointed) angels stern (and) severe, who disobey not, (from executing) the Commands they receive from Allah, but do that which they are commanded.” [TMQ At-Tahrīm: 6]
He (swt) said:
]فَإِمَّا يَأْتِيَنَّكُمْ مِنِّي هُدًى فَمَنْ اتَّبَعَ هُدَايَ فَلاَ يَضِلُّ وَلاَ يَشْقَى. وَمَنْ أَعْرَضَ عَنْ ذِكْرِي فَإِنَّ لَهُ مَعِيشَةً ضَنكًا وَنَحْشُرُهُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ أَعْمَى. قَالَ رَبِّ لِمَ حَشَرْتَنِي أَعْمَى وَقَدْ كُنتُ بَصِيرًا. قَالَ كَذَلِكَ أَتَتْكَ آيَاتُنَا فَنَسِيتَهَا وَكَذَلِكَ الْيَوْمَ تُنسَى. [
“Then if there comes to you guidance from Me, then whoever follows My Guidance shall neither go astray, nor fall into distress and misery. But whosoever turns away from My Reminder (i.e. neither believes in this Qur’ān nor acts on its orders, etc.) verily, for him is a life of hardship, and We shall raise him up blind on the Day of Resurrection. He will say: “O my Lord! Why have you raised me up blind, while I had sight (before).” (Allah) will say: “Like this, our came unto you, but you disregarded them (i.e. you left them, did not think deeply in them, and you turned away from them), and so this Day, you will be neglected (in the Hell-fire, away from Allah’s Mercy).” [TMQ Taha: 123-126]
The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:
}بادروا بالأعمال فتناً كقطع الليل المظلم يصبح الرجل مؤمناً ويمسي كافراً، ويمسي مؤمناً ويصبح كافراً يبيع دينه بعرض من الدنيا{
“Be prompt in doing good deeds (before you are overtaken) by turbulence which would be like a part of the dark night. During (that stormy period) a man would be a Muslim in the morning and turn an unbeliever in the evening or he would be a believer in the evening and turn an unbeliever in the morning, and would sell his Dīn for worldly goods” [Sahīh Muslim: Kitāb ul-Iman, 213]
Those who used to rush to the forgiveness and Jannah of Allah and the good deeds existed in the time of the Messenger of Allah (saw) as well as in subsequent eras. The Ummah still produces the likes of those people who answered the Call of their Lord and sold themselves seeking the Good Pleasure of Allah (swt).
It came in the Hadīth which is agreed upon and narrated by Jabir that:
}قال رجل للنبي يوم أحد: أرأيت إن قتلت فأين أنا؟ قال: في الجنة فألقى تمرات في يده ثم قاتل حتى قتل. {
A man asked the Prophet (saw) on the day of Uhud: “Where would I be if I were to be killed?” He (saw) said: “In Jannah. So the man threw the dates from his hand and plunged himself into the fighting until he was killed.” (Agreed upon)
The hadīth of Anas (ra) reported by Muslim states:
}فانطلق رسول الله وأصحابه حتى سبقوا المشركين إلى بدر وجاء المشركون، فقال رسول الله: قوموا إلى جنة عرضها السماوات والأرض، قال يقول عمير بن الحمام الأنصاري: يا رسول الله جنة عرضها السماوات والأرض؟ قال: نعم، قال بخ بخ، فقال رسول الله: ما يحملك على قول بخ بخ؟ قال: لا والله يا رسول الله إلا رجاءة أن أكون من أهلها، قال فإنك من أهلها، فأخرج تمرات من قرنه، فجعل يأكل منهن، ثم قال: لئن أنا حييت حتى آكل تمراتي هذه إنها لحياة طويلة، قال: فرمى بما كان معه من التمر، ثم قاتلهم حتى قتل. {
“The Messenger of Allah (saw) and his companions reached Badr before the Mushriks. When the Mushriks came Allah’s Messenger said to his companions: Let us go to a Jannah whose breadth is that of the heavens and the earth. ‘Umayr b. al-Hummam al-Ansaari exclaimed: O Allah’s Messenger, a Jannah whose breadth is that of the heavens and the earth? He said: Yes. So Umayr responded: How amazing! So Allah’s Messenger asked him: what made you say that? He said: O Allah’s Messenger, by Allah I did not say this except for the hope that I will be from its inhabitants. Then he (saw) said: Indeed you are from its inhabitants. ‘Umayr took out some dates from his quiver and began to eat them. He then said to himself: If I live to finish eating these dates then indeed this would be long life. So he threw the rest of the dates in his hand and began to fight the disbelievers until he was killed.”
It came in the hadīth agreed upon and narrated by Anas (ra) that:
}غاب عمي أنس بن النضر عن قتال بدر، فقال يا رسول الله غبت عن أول قتال قاتلت المشركين، لئن الله أشهدني قتال المشركين، ليرين الله ما أصنع، فلما كان يوم أحد، وانكشف المسلمون، قال: اللهم إني أعتذر إليك مما صنع هؤلاء يعني الصحابة، وأبرأ إليك مما صنع هؤلاء يعني المشركين، ثم تقدم فاستقبله سعد بن معاذ، فقال: يا سعد بن معاذ الجنة ورب النضر إني أجد ريحها من دون أحد، قال سعد فما استطعتُ يا رسول الله ما صنع، قال أنس: فوجدنا به بضعاً وثمانين ضربة بالسيف أو طعنة برمح أو رمية بسهم، ووجدناه قد قتل، وقد مثل به المشركون، فما عرفه أحد إلا أخته ببنانه. {
“My paternal uncle Anas b. an-Nadr was absent from the battle of Badr. He said: “O Messenger of Allah (saw), I was absent from the first battle which you fought the Mushriks. If Allah allows me to witness a battle with the Mushriks then Allah will see how bravely I will fight.” On the day of Uhud when the Muslims turned their backs and fled, he said: “O Allah I seek pardon from You for what these people have done (meaning the Sahabah) and I denounce what these people have done (meaning the Mushriks).” As he advanced towards Uhud he was met by Sa’d b. Mu’adh. He said: “O Sa’d b. Mu’adh, The Jannah! By the Lord of an-Nadr I can smell its fragrance from the direction of Uhud.” Later Sa’d said: “O Messenger of Allah! I could not do what he Anas has done. We found more than eighty wounds caused by swords, spears and arrows on his body. We found him dead. His body had been so badly mutilated by the Mushriks that none except his sister could recognise him by his fingers.” Anas said: “we used to think that the following verse was revealed concerning him and his like; ‘Among the believers are men who have been true to their covenant with Allah.’ [TMQ Al-Ahzāb: 23].”
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of Abu Saroo’ah (ra) who said:
}صليت وراء النبي بالمدينة العصر فسلم، ثم قام مسرعاً، فتخطى رقاب الناس إلى بعض حجر نسائه، ففزع الناس من سرعته، فخرج عليهم، فرأى أنهم قد عجبوا من سرعته فقال: ذكرت شيئاً من تبر عندنا، فكرهت أن يحبسني، فأمرت بقسمته. {
“I offered the ‘Asr prayer behind the Prophet at Medina. When he had finished the prayer with Taslim, he got up hurriedly and went out by walking between the necks of the people to one of the dwellings of his wives. The people got scared at his speed. The Prophet came back and found the people surprised at his haste and said to them, “I remembered a piece of gold lying in my house and I did not want it to divert my attention from Allah’s worship, so I have ordered it to be distributed (in charity).”
And in another version:
}كنت خلفت في البيت تبراً من الصدقة، فكرهت أن أبيته. {
“I left a piece of gold from the charity money in the house; I disliked leaving it there.” This indicates how Muslims should rush to implement that which Allah obligated upon them.
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of al-Baraa’ who said:
}لَمَّا قَدِمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَـلَّمَ الْمَدِينَـةَ صَلَّى نَحْوَ بَيْتِ الْمَقْدِسِ سِتَّةَ عَشَرَ أَوْ سَبْعَةَ عَشَرَ شَهْرًا وَكَانَ يُحِبُّ أَنْ يُوَجَّهَ إِلَى الْكَعْبَةِ فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى قَدْ نَرَى تَقَلُّبَ وَجْهِكَ فِي السَّمَاءِ فَلَنُوَلِّيَنَّكَ قِبْـلَةً تَرْضَاهَا فَوُجِّهَ نَحْوَ الْكَعْبَةِ وَصَلَّى مَعَهُ رَجُلٌ الْعَصْرَ ثُمَّ خَرَجَ فَمَرَّ عَلَى قَوْمٍ مِـنْ الأَنصـارِ فَقَـالَ هُوَ يَشْهَدُ أَنَّهُ صَلَّى مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَأَنَّهُ قَدْ وُجِّهَ إِلَى الْكَعْبَةِ فَانْحَرَفُوا وَهُمْ رُكُوعٌ فِي صَلاةِ الْعَصْرِ. {
“When the Messenger of Allah saw) came to Madinah he faced the direction of Bayt al-Maqdis for about sixteen or seventeen months. He wanted to face the Ka’bah so Allah (swt) revealed the ayah:
]قَدْ نَرَى تَقَلُّبَ وَجْهِكَ فِي السَّمَاءِ فَلَنُوَلِّيَنَّكَ قبلَةً ترضاها. [
‘Verily We have seen the turning of your (Muhammad) face towards the heaven. Surely we shall turn you to a Qiblah (direction) that shall please you.’ [TMQ Al-Baqarah:144] So when he was made to face the Ka’bah a man was praying ‘Asr with him. Then he went out and passed by some people from the Ansar. He says he bears witness that he prayed with the Prophet (saw) and that he was made to turn towards the Ka’bah and all turned while they were in rukū’ (bowing position) in the Salatul ‘Asr.”
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of Ibn Abi Awfa (may Allah be pleased with them both) who said:
}أَصَابَتْنَا مَجَاعَةٌ لَيَالِيَ خَيْبَرَ فَلَمَّا كَانَ يَوْمُ خَيْبَرَ وَقَعْنَا فِي الْحُمُرِ الأَهْلِيَّةِ فَانْتَحَرْنَاهَا فَلَمَّا غَلَتِ الْقُدُورُ نَادَى مُنَادِي رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَكْفِئُوا الْقُدُورَ فَلا تَطْعَمُوا مِنْ لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ شَيْئًا قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ فَقُلْنَا إِنَّمَا نَهَى النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لأنَّها لَمْ تُخَمَّسْ قَالَ وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ حَرَّمَهَا أَلْبَتَّةَ وَسَأَلْتُ سَعِيدَ بْنَ جُبَيْرٍ فَقَالَ حَرَّمَهَا أَلْبَتَّةَ. {
“We were struck by extreme hunger on the nights of Khaybar. On the day of Khaybar we found some domestic Asses so we slaughtered them. When the pots began to boil the caller of the Messenger of Allah (saw) called out to us and said: overturn your pots and do not eat anything of the meat of donkeys. ‘Abd Allah said: we said that the Prophet (saw) forbade them because the Khumus (i.e. a fifth of the spoils) had not been taken out of it. He said others said that he has prohibited them completely. I asked Sa’eed b. Jubayr who said, he has prohibited them completely.”
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of Anas b. Malik (ra), he said:
}كُنْتُ أَسْقِي أَبَا طَلْحَةَ الأنْصَارِيَّ وَأَبَا عُبَيْدَةَ بْنَ الْجَرَّاحِ وَأُبَيَّ بْنَ كَعْبٍ شَرَابًا مِنْ فَضِيخٍ وَهُوَ تَمْرٌ فَجَاءَهُمْ آتٍ فَقَالَ إِنَّ الْخَمْرَ قَدْ حُرِّمَتْ فَقَالَ أَبُو طَلْحَةَ يَا أَنَسُ قُمْ إِلَى هَذِهِ الْجِرَارِ فَاكْسِرْهَا قَالَ أَنَسٌ فَقُمْتُ إِلَى مِهْرَاسٍ لَنَا فَضَرَبْتُهَا بِأَسْفَلِهِ حَتَّى انْكَسَرَتْ. {
“I was serving drinks to Abu Talha al-Ansari, ‘Ubaidah b. al-Jarrrah and Ubayy b. Ka’b prepared from unripe dates and fresh dates when a visitor came and he said: Verily liquor has been prohibited. Thereupon, Abu Talha said: O Anas! Stand up and break this pitcher. I stood up and (took hold) of a pointed stone and struck the pitcher with its lower part until it broke into pieces.”
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of ‘Ayisha (ra) who said:
}وَبَلَغْنَا أَنَّهُ لَمَّا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى أَنْ يَرُدُّوا إِلَى الْمُشْرِكِينَ مَا أَنْفَقُوا عَلَى مَنْ هَاجَرَ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِهِمْ وَحَكَمَ عَلَى الْمُسْلِمِينَ أَنْ لا يُمَسِّكُوا بِعِصَمِ الْكَوَافِرِ أَنَّ عُمَرَ طَلَّقَ امْرَأَتَيْنِ. {
“We have been told also that when Allah revealed the order that the Muslims should return to the pagans what they had spent on their wives who emigrated (after embracing Islam) and that the Muslims should not keep unbelieving women as their wives, ‘Umar divorced two of his wives.”
Al-Bukharī reported on the authority of ‘Ayisha (may Allah be pleased with her) who said:
}يرحم اللهُ نساء المهاجرات الأول،لمّا أنزل الله ]وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِن[ شققن مروطهنّ فاختمرن بها. {
“May Allah have mercy on the Muhajir women. When Allah (swt) revealed the verse: “And let them draw their headscarfs all over necks and bosoms” [TMQ An-Nur:31] they tore their wrappers and concealed themselves with them.”
Abu Dawud reported on the authority of Safiyyah bint Shaybah who reported on the authority of ‘Ayisha (may Allah be pleased her) that:
}أنها ذكرت نساء الأنصار فأثنت عليهن وقالت لهن معروفاً، وقالت: لمّـا نزلت سورة النور عَمِدْنَ إلى حجورٍ فشققنهن فاتخذنه خُمُرا. {
She (‘Ayisha) mentioned the women of Ansar, praised them and said good words about them. She then said: “When Surat an-Nur came down, they took the curtains, tore them and made head covers of them.”
Ibn Ishaq said:
} ... وقَدِمَ على رسول الله (saw) الأشعث بن قيس في وفد كِنْدة. فحدثني الزهري أنه قدم في ثمانين راكباً من كندة، فدخلوا على رسول الله (saw) مسجدَه، قد رجَّلوا جُمَمَهم (جمع جُمَّة وهي شعر الرأس الكثيف) وتكحَّلوا، عليهم جُبَبُ الحِبَرَة قد كفَّفوها بالحرير. فلما دخلوا على رسول الله (saw) قال لهم: ألم تسلموا؟ قالوا: بلى. قال: فما بال هذا الحرير في أعناقكم؟ قال: فشَـقُّوه منها فألقَوْه. {
“…Al-Ash’ath b. Qays came to the Messenger of Allah as part of the Kindah delegation. Az-Zuhri informed to me that he came with eighty riders from Kindah. They entered the mosque of the Messenger of Allah (saw). They had long hair and put kohl (in their eyes). They wore Jubbahs with silk hems. When they entered the presence of Allah’s Messenger he said to them: did not you embrace Islam? They said: Yes. He (saw) asked: ‘then what is this silk put around your necks? So they tore the silk and threw it away.”
Ibn Jareer reported on the authority of Abu Buraydah who narrated from his father that:
}بينا نحن قعود على شراب لنا ونحن على رملة ونحن ثلاثة أو أربعة، وعندنا باطية لنا ونحن نشـرب الخـمـر حِـلاًّ إذ قـمـت حتى آتي رسولَ الله (saw) فأسلم عليه إذ نـزل تحريم الخمر ]يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِنَّمَا الْخَمْرُ وَالْمَيْسِرُ[ إلى آخر الآيتين ]فَهَلْ أَنْتُمْ مُنتَهُونَ[. فجـئـت إلى أصـحـابي فقرأتها عليهم إلى قوله ]فَهَلْ أَنْتُمْ مُنتَهُونَ[. قال: وبعض القوم شربته في يده قد شرب بعضها وبقي بعض في الإناء، فقال بالإناء تحت شفته العليا، كما يفعل الحجّام، ثم صبّوا ما في باطيتهم فقالوا: انتهينا ربَّنا. {
“While we were sitting down on sand and we were three or four (people), having a jug before us, where we were drinking khamr halāl. Then I went to the Messenger of Allah (saw) to greet him. At that point Qur’ān was revealed prohibiting the khamr (intoxicants) “O you who believe! Khamr and games of chance” upto the end of the two verses “Will you have then desisted?” Some of the people had his drink in his hand, where he drank a part of it while the rest is still in the cup. He would raise his cup to the bottom of his upper lip like the cupper does. Then they flooded off what was there in their jug and said: We desisted O our Lord.”
Hanzalah b. Abi ‘Aamir (may Allah be pleased with him) who was bathed by the angels heard the call to the battle of Uhud. He hurriedly responded to the call. He was martyred on the day of Uhud. Ibn Ishaq said: The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:
}إن صاحبكم لتغسله الملائكة فاسألوا أهله ما شأنه؟{
“Your companion is being bathed by the angels, ask his family what happened to him?” His wife was asked. She had been a bride on that night. She said he went out in a state of impurity when he heard the call. The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:
}كذلك غسلته الملائكة. {
“That is why the angels have bathed him”
Imam Ahmad reported on the authority of Rafi’ b. Khadeej (ra) who said:
}كُنَّا نُحَاقِلُ بِالأَرْضِ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَنُكْرِيهَا بِالثُّلُثِ وَالرُّبُعِ وَالطَّعَامِ الْمُسَمَّى فَجَاءَنَا ذَاتَ يَوْمٍ رَجُلٌ مِنْ عُمُومَتِي فَقَالَ نَهَانَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ أَمْرٍ كَانَ لَنَا نَافِعًا، وَطَاعَةُ اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ أَنْفَعُ لَنَا نَهَانَا أَنْ نُحَاقِلَ بِالْأَرْضِ فَنُكْرِيَهَا عَلَى الثُّلُثِ وَالرُّبُعِ وَالطَّعَامِ الْمُسَمَّى وَأَمَرَ رَبَّ الْأَرْضِ أَنْ يَزْرَعَهَا أَوْ يُزْرِعَهَا وَكَرِهَ كِرَاءَهَا وَمَا سِوَى ذَلِكَ. {
We used to cultivate land in the time of the Messenger of Allah. We used to lease it for a third, fourth or a specified amount of food. One day a man from my paternal relatives came and said: The Messenger of Allah (saw) forbade us from something which was beneficial for us but the obedience of Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He forbade us from cultivating the land by leasing it for a third, fourth or a certain amount of food, he ordered the landowner either to cultivate it himself or give it to others to cultivate it for their own and he disliked that it be leased or the like.’

Working towards establishing the Islamic Khilafah is an individual duty that requires utmost effort and utmost speed

Working towards establishing the Islamic State that rules by what Allah (SWT) has revealed is in essence a duty of sufficiency (Fardhu Kifayah). However, since the sufficiency is not fulfilled despite the efforts of those who work towards it, the duty expands until it includes every Muslim.  This is the case in every duty of sufficiency.

The evidence about the obligation of working towards the establishment of the Islamic State is conclusive in text and in meaning, hence, whoever denies it is a Kafir.  As for he who acknowledges this fact but does not work towards it, he is sinful.  This evidence is reflected in the text which commands the Muslims to abide by and refer their affairs to the Islamic Shari’ah.  It is also reflected in the texts which forbid the Muslims from referring their affairs to other than the Islamic Shari’ah:  Allah (SWT) says: ‘As for the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands.’ [5 - 38] T.M.Q.  He (SWT) says: ‘The woman and the man guilty of fornication lash each of them a hundred lashes.’ [24 - 2] T.M.Q.

Allah (SWT) says: ‘They wish to refer in judgement to Taghut (the evil one) and they had been ordered to reject him…’ [4 - 60] T.M.Q.  Allah (SWT) also says: ‘No by your God, they shall not have total belief until they make you judge in what is in dispute between them.’ [4 - 65] T.M.Q. And there are many other Shari’ah text to that effect.  Hence, the largest part of the Shari’ah rules would be suspended in the absence of an Islamic State, and the Ummah is responsible for this.

As for the fact that this action must be undertaken by every Muslim and with his utmost capability, this is also conclusive in text and in meaning, and whoever denies it would be Kafir, and he who neglects it would be sinful.  The evidence is obtained from the text which have come to confirm and establish this meaning; Allah (SWT) says: ‘So fear Allah as much as you can.’ [27 - 93] T.M.Q.

He (SWT) also says: ‘On no soul does Allah place a burden greater than it can bear.’ [2 - 86] T.M.Q.  This means that a person should give the utmost of his ability, not the half, nor the minimum.  And when He (SWT) says: ‘So fear Allah as much as you can.’ [22 - 73] T.M.Q. i.e. one should fear and obey Allah (SWT) to the maximum of his ability, not half of it. When a Muslim witnesses the Munkarat (evil deeds) around him, he is ordered to change them by the utmost of his ability, not part of his ability, for the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘He who witnesses a Munkar, let him change it by his hand, if he could not, then by his tongue, and if he could not, then by his heart, and this would be the least amount of Iman.’  The phrase of  ‘if he could not’ indicates that if he used the utmost of his ability and could not change the Munkar.

Some people may fail to differentiate between the work towards establishing the Khilafah and establishing it immediately.  They may say: ‘We cannot remove the existing regime and establish the Khilafah State in its place’, and since we cannot, we are therefore not commissioned with this duty because Allah (SWT) does not burden a soul with more than it could bear.  This saying could only result from ignorance or from malice and deception.  In order to dissipate this misunderstanding, we say: If the group working towards establishing the Khilafah could achieve this immediately, it would not be allowed to delay it.  If it could not achieve this immediately, then it should work, multiply its efforts and strengthen itself further in order to fulfill this task even after a while.  Hence, he who could not achieve a task immediately, he should thrive with his utmost ability to achieve it whenever he could.

Furthermore, why do we say: ‘we cannot ?’ This matter is not requested from one single person, nor is it requested from one single party, nor a single group, nor a single country.  It is by Shari’ah, demanded from the whole of the Islamic Ummah, Arabs and non Arabs alike, and it is at present an individual duty upon every Muslim. Hence, is the Islamic Ummah really unable to fulfill this duty ? or is she slack, neglectful and sinful due to the influence of the Western culture and the influence of the governments’ scholars, the hypocrites?

Also, when we say that it is at present an individual duty upon every Muslim to work towards establishing the Islamic State with the utmost capability, this means that he should forsake many of the permitted actions and many of the recommended (Mandoub) actions if these distracted him from performing this duty.  A Muslim should work to earn his living and to support his dependents.  This is an individual duty upon him.  Carrying the da’awah in order to establish the Khilafah is also an individual duty upon him at present.  So which of the two duties takes precedence over the other?  Shari’ah also demands of the Muslim to perform all the duties. However when these duties throng together, so that if he performed some of them he would not have time to perform the other duties, in this case it is Shari’ah itself that decides which of the duties he should put forward and which duties he should defer. Hence, the issue is a Shari’ah one and not down to whim and desire.  The people of knowledge and Ijtihad are capable and competent when it comes to understanding the priorities.  In this context, to earn a living takes precedence over working towards establishing Khilafah when the two duties clash.  However, the earning of one’s living that takes precedence over the work towards establishing the Khilafah would be the earning of the basic needs, not the luxuries.  Hence, if the Muslim were working and earning enough to cover his basic needs, he would not after that be allowed to take another work to secure the luxuries if this work would prevent him from carrying the da’awah to establish the Khilafah.

Most of the time, work does not prevent the Muslim from carrying the da’awah, for as long as he works amongst people, he could carry the da’awah to them while working.

It is not a valid Shari’ah excuse for the Muslim to say: I cannot work towards establishing the Khilafah because this would lead to my dismissal from work, or my imprisonment: this is so because the Muslim should not continue in the work that lands him into sin.  Just as the Muslim is forbidden from earning from intoxicants, usury, bribery or cheating. Likewise, he is forbidden from earning a living by supporting a system of Kufr or by keeping silent over a system of Kufr.

As for the work towards establishing the Khilafah with utmost speed, this also is conclusive in text and in meaning.  This is so because the Shari’ah rules revealed by Allah (SWT) became applicable the moment they are conveyed; when the rule of shifting the direction of the Qiblah from Bayt-ul-Maqdis to the Sacred Mosque was revealed, those who were praying at the time did turn immediately towards the Ka’abah.  Hence, the rules are in principle for immediate implementation unless they were an evidence allowing relaxation in implementing a certain rule.  Hence, when Allah (SWT) says: ‘O you people fear your God’ [4 - 1] T.M.Q.  and when the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘He who witnesses a Munkar, let him change it…’, these commands are for immediate implementation, and so are the commands related to the establishment of the Hudud (penal code), the judiciary system, carrying the da’awah to the world by way of Jihad, protecting the frontiers and implementing the Shari’ah rules upon the subjects.  All these commands must be implemented immediately.  Furthermore, the Muslims are forbidden from remaining for more than three days without a Khalifah who implements the Shari’ah.  The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: ‘And he who dies without a baya’a (pledge of allegiance) on his neck dies a death of Jahiliyyah.’

Therefore, there is no excuse whatsoever for he who says: ‘I shall work towards establishing the Islamic State, but only after I graduate from University’ or says: ‘After I finish the project I am working on at present.’ Or anything similar, because carrying the da’awah must be undertaken immediately if this were possible: to neglect it would be sinful.

What is most important when working towards establishing the Khilafah is explaining this concept to the Muslims and making them perceive it until it becomes part of the axioms known from Islam by necessity.  While explaining this to them, the hearts of the Muslims should be also charged with the Islamic emotions which drive them to work, persevere and sacrifice.  Allah (SWT) says: ‘O you who believe answer the call of Allah and His Messenger when He calls you to that which gives you life.’ [8 - 24] T.M.Q.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Political Concepts: The Middle East Issue

The following is an extract of the english translation of an excellent book entitled 'Political Concepts' by Hizb ut-Tahrir which was published in the Arab world in 2005 prior to the Arab spring. 

The Middle East (ME) Issue

It is an issue related to Islam and its danger; the strategic location and its control over the communications between Europe, Africa and Asia; the Jewish entity and its being the first line for defending the Western interests; colonialism and its material benefits particularly the oil. Thus, such an issue that is related to Islam, the strategic location, the Jewish state, colonialism and oil, is indeed a very important one, not only for the people of the region and Muslims, but rather for the entire world.

As in regards with Islam, it was and still forms the greatest danger to America and the West. Besides, the region of the Middle East is considered the natural departure point for the Islamic da’wa to the world. Therefore, it was not strange that America looked at Islam as the prime and sole enemy to her after the collapse of socialism. She used the slogans of terrorism, religious extremism and fundamentalism as a cover to her campaign against Islam and Muslims in this region. She tries, using her utmost to distance the political Islamic movements from authority through using the styles of suppression, repression, torture and containment, which her puppet governments in the region follow. Bush has declared this new crusade war openly against Muslims. John Ashcroft, the American minister of justice said: “Sincerely, terrorism is hidden in Islam itself and not only in some of those that embrace it”. He also claimed that Allah encourages terrorism in the Quran.

As in regards with the strategic location of the ME and its control over the communications, this results from its existence at the crossroad of the old three continents: Africa, Europe and Asia, besides it controls over the straits of Gibraltar, Bosporus, Aden, Hormuz, and the Suez Canal, Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, Red Sea and the Gulf. This is besides its being a crossroads of the raw materials and goods between the three continents.

Its strategic importance used to form a critical point between the Western and Soviet camps before the détente. This is because the ME forms the western belt in the military ring imposed against the past SU. This western belt was the first line of the west for defending ME and Africa in the face of the SU. Therefore, military bases were built in the ME including nuclear bases. There were also many attempts to connect the ME states to military alliances. Besides, many airports and highways were built in it; so it had great strategic importance. After the agreement between the two superpowers in 1961, it lost its military importance. Therefore, the issue of military alliances in it was ignored, and the nuclear bases were removed. The two superpowers worked together ahead in removing the British military bases, and succeeded in removing the bases in Eden, Libya and east of Suez Canal; besides they tried to remove its bases in Cyprus. Thus, at that time the ME ceased to have a strategic importance. However, after the end of the cold war and the elimination of the SU, the ME restored its strategic importance, particularly for America in facing Russia and Europe. So, America started again to build military bases in the gulf, occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, and declared Bahrain, and then Pakistan and Kuwait as strategic allies.

She recently considered it as the front line for defending the security of USA; and she prepared a plan for it, which she called (The Great ME Plan). Then she adjusted it to (The ME and African Plan). She presented it to the G8 summit that was held in June 2004 in Sea Island area.

However, the important location of the ME that extends from Morocco at the Atlantic Ocean in the west to Iran and Iraq on the gulf in the east, and from Turkey in the north to the Great African desert in the south, i.e. it includes all the Arab states in addition to Turkey and Iran, this important location made it a target for the colonialists and an object for the desires of the ambitious, due to its huge importance in the issue of transportation and communication, not only at this time, but even since the crusader wars till today.

As regarding the Jewish entity planted in Palestine it became the heart of the ME issue and it became a cause for instability, not in the ME but also in the entire world, as acknowledged by the west itself that agreed 90% of the problems of the Islamic world that annoys the west returns to the problem of the existence of the Jewish state in Palestine, i.e. in the heart of the Islamic world.

As regarding its colonial importance it is the one that caused its affliction and eliminated it as a great state and a global force. It also changed it to a western colony where the western states compete in it over colonialism and hegemony. This is because the oil that exists in it is more than half of the world reserves; besides the raw materials that exist in Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Iran and others form a huge wealth that represents 10 times the wealth of Europe and America, put together. This is the reason of the competition and struggle between the states over it, where the wars of America in the gulf are tangible evidence to that.

Getting these four angles together in one issue, namely; Islam, the oil, the strategic location and (Israel) is enough to make of this issue the most dangerous and most complicated one; to the point it became the focus and the prime issue. So, it is more complicated than what the great states can solve, and more than they can understand. Therefore, it is a thorny issue and hugely complicated, which the great states have no solution for; and it will not be solved except by the establishment of the Islamic State (Khilafah).

The ME was under the authority and control of Islam and the Islamic state till mid 18th century. Since Berlin conference, i.e. since late 18th century the great European states started their attempt to invade it. So, each of France, England and Italy attacked it; and the attack was repeated till the Islamic state was demolished through the destruction of the Ottoman state and the complete removal of the Khilafah. Thus, the ME settled down under colonialism, authority and influence of England. Its influence covered all of its states even those that were not colonised like Turkey and Afghanistan. France had only a little part, which was confined to the northern part of Sham known as Syria, including its south west coast known as Lebanon. This situation continued till the end of World War II, where France was thrown away from it, and the British colonialism changed into a new style through concentrating its division and giving a name of a state for each part of it. Therefore, World War II ended while the entire Middle East was considered a western colony, actually a British colony. Thus, it was considered a part of the free world and part of the western camp, where the eastern camp had no presence in it. Two factors helped England to solely colonise the ME: The first is the political, economical and international weakness of France. So it could not match and compete with England regarding colonialism in the ME. The second is the insistence of America to follow an isolationist policy after the World War I; so England acted unilaterally in colonising the ME throughout the 19th century and until the mid of 20th century. However, after 1950 the situation differed and radically changed, because colonial struggle started between England and America, which led to what the ME witnessed from wars, military coups, manoeuvres and conspiracies. The struggle went on ups and downs till America managed to take the initiative in the ME, where England became so weak that it could not face America openly. It however, acted stubbornly for preserving as much as it could of its colonies; and it endeavoured to have even a partial presence in the region through associating America in her plans as it did in the occupation of Iraq.

Hence, it can be said that the struggle over the ME after World War II was effectively concentrated between America and England as follows:

The American and British policies were based on partnerships regarding the ME after the World War II. So, the two states used to meet and review their policies and coordinate their plans and styles. England continued allowing America to devour some benefits particularly in terms of the oil of the Arab Peninsular. It also remained to please her at some times; but it used to face her over whatever it considered it harmful to its interests.

When the issue of the Jews in Palestine was raised America had the view of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine in order to use it a means for colonising the region. England at that time did not take a decision regarding establishing a Jewish state. It was hesitant between making Palestine an entity controlled by Jews and having a Jewish state. It wanted to link that to its colonisation of the rest of the Arab countries. Therefore, it did not decide the matter, so it transferred the issue to the UN. When the UN decided establishing a Jewish state under the pressure from America, England remained silent and left the issue for the future time to decide whether the region can accept the presence of a Jewish state amongst Muslims, or this Islamic body will spit it out. Its policy towards the Jewish state continued on the basis of waiting for the decision of the future.

As regarding America, it worked hard to concentrate (Israel) and eliminate anything that could obstruct this task. England used to oppose her over this issue but secretly. So, this created severe struggle between England and America over the presence of the Jewish state.

Moreover, America tried to draw oil pipelines across Jordan, Syria and Lebanon to the Mediterranean Sea, but England obstructed her plan. Because it was old in the region, it was able to influence all the rulers of the region for they were its agent. Therefore America found that the only means to change the situation of the region was to apply the same policy she used in South America, which is bringing in military rulers and undertaking military coups. So, it carried out the first military coup in Syria through Husni Za’im who gave concession to America for drawing an oil pipeline, where the pipeline was drawn and thus she overcame the problem. However, England noticed that America wanted to colonise and take the region from it; so it started to ferociously resist that by the political styles and manoeuvres and through the people of the region.

After the military coup of Husni Za’im, the ferocity of the opposition by England to all the American projects, and the change of secret struggle between the two states to almost an open one, the diplomatic representatives of America in the ME noticed the threat against the military and economic interests of America in the region. They considered the continuous link between the American policy and the British policy meant that America would remain, as it was before World War II, just a tool used by England. Where it would only give her a small bait to keep her in the region for defending it, but it deprives her of all the resources of the region, and keeps the entire region under the control of England alone. The authorized American diplomats in the Arab group having noticed that realised the necessity of introducing fundamental amendments to the direction of Washington policy, and the need of making new adjustments. So, they decided to use cooperation with the people of the region as a basis for the development and improvement of such a policy. They however found themselves at the same time before a large set of problems, in addition to the presence of (Israel), and the great hatred and grudge Muslims carry towards it. Therefore, they found it necessary to address these problems before starting serious thinking and before starting to change the region from a British basis to an American basis. So, they called for holding a conference amongst them to discuss this subject. In November 1950 they held their first conference in Istanbul. This was chaired by Mr George Magi, a deputy in the American State Department responsible for the affairs of the ME and North Africa. This conference lasted for five consecutive days. They discussed in this secret conference the most important political, strategic and economic conditions of this region. Their opinion settled that it is not possible for the American policy to be linked to the British policy if America really wanted to change the ME into an American basis and use the cooperation with the people of the region as one of the styles to change this region. They used the rejection of Syria at the time of the president Shukri Quwwatli to give concession for drawing an oil pipeline, and taking that concession through the coup carried out by Husni Za’im as tangible evidence to the validity of their view. Added to that the British carried out another coup at the same year of 1949 by Al-Hinnawi who removed Husni Za’im and thus Syria returned back to the control of British. All of that supported their view that the American policy must be detached from the British policy if America wanted to work in the region. This conference is considered one of the most important tools to direct the America diplomacy in the Arabic field. It presented recommendations to each of the White House, State of Department, Pentagon and the Marine. These recommendations were presented after an important introduction, as follows:

The experience of the recent World War II has proved that the ME is a fundamental basis, where all the factors exist necessary for waging a war against the SU. There is no chance of success in contemplating an attack against the Russian oil fields in the Caucasus and depriving the machine of Soviet war from its richest oil revenues through military cooperation with Turkey only. It is rather necessary to have organised air bases in Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, on condition that Iraq and Egypt change to become a big depot that secures supplies of men, arms and provisions to any plan of offense that aims at surrounding and sabotaging the Soviet oil fields in Baku and the Caucasus, in general.

Moreover, the military campaigns against Greece, Sicily and Italy during the entire period from 1941 to 1944 showed beyond any doubt the importance of the ME in providing and supplying such type of decisive military operations that secured victory for the war of the allies forces and containment of the enemy armies inside the European fortress.

This introduction ended with presenting recommendations that were coined by the agreement of all the delegates in form of four recommendations:

First: Detachment from the British policy in every matter related to the pending issues between it and the Arab world.

Second: Using the support of Arabs’ national demands as a basis of an American policy in the ME.

Third: Support of Egypt regarding its demands from England, and encouraging a similar movement in Iraq.

Fourth: Abstain from the constant diplomatic and economic support to (Israel) and encourage the UN to executing the project of dividing Palestine into two states, an Arab and a Jewish, besides executing the resolutions of the Security Council regarding the settlement of Arab refugees on the basis of their return to their homes and compensating those who do not want to return.

It is said that they gave a special recommendation regarding Egypt, where they advised that it is necessary that America takes Egypt from England and expels England from it. This is besides founding a strong authority in it that leads the entire region, because history proved that Egypt is the gate of the ME.

These recommendations were submitted to the ruling authority in the USA, where the Democratic Party was in power at that time, who were used to flattering the British. Truman was the president of USA, and he came to power supported by two factors: first is the Jewish influence, and second is the British influence amongst the American circles. Besides, Truman was linked with many obligations towards England and towards the Jews as well. Therefore, these decisions were not given the attention the diplomats hoped for them, though they were given some attention at the time of Eisenhower.

However, the American became active in the ME after the mentioned conference of the diplomats. So, America undertook a brave attempt to make peace between the Arab states and (Israel) and to expel England from Jordan and Iraq. The American diplomats made contacts with King Abdullah and negotiated with him for reaching a deal with him. The deal is summarized that Abdullah turned away from England and instead went along with America. In return, America gave him a free hand for annexing Iraq and Hejaz to him, thus making a state made of Jordan, Iraq and Hejaz, where he annexed Syria and Lebanon to it after that. In return for that he would conclude peace with (Israel), and America would give him the necessary aid and loans for reviving this new state economically. King Abdullah agreed to that and started working to realise this plan. He went to Iraq where he met with Abdulilah and Nuri Said, discussed the matter with them and asked them to work with him. However, these two officials made contact with the British ambassador in Baghdad and disclosed to him the plans of king Abdullah. The British prevented them from working with him; therefore they did not accept his offer but did not stop him, thus leaving the matter pending. The king returned back to Jordan and invited Riyad Sulh (PM of Lebanon) to work with him and help him in the plan. Riyad Sulh accepted that; for it seems he had already changed to the Americans. So, the British killed Riyad Sulh in Amman on his way to the airport while returning to Beirut. One week after that king Abdullah was killed in Al-Quds, inside Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa due to an open conspiracy planned by John Glubb to kill him. The American ambassador in Amman warned him openly, one day before his killing of the conspiracy; and thus this plan died down. In that year, 1952 American presidential elections took place where the Republic Party won the post, manifested in Eisenhower. He assumed authority at the beginning of 1953, where struggle between England and America intensified, because Eisenhower was known of giving preference to the American high interest in its military and international forms over the Jewish and British pressure. Therefore, the struggle between America and England became ferocious, where America managed to take Egypt from England and then expelled it from Egypt. Earlier to that America orchestrated a coup in Syria where she brought to power her agent Adib Sheeshakli. Thus, Egypt and Syria became with America. Since that date all Arab states became an open field for Anglo-American struggle. Many actions took place in it that made it like a ball that moves from America’s court to England’s court, and back again from England’s court to America’s court, and so on. This was manifested in many actions that covered Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Most of these actions were in Syria, as being the heart of the region, and it generally influences all Arab countries. Therefore, many political actions happened in Syria, most prominent of which was the frequency of military coups. After killing Husni Za’im in a way that revealed the grudge of England against him, and once his authority ended, England started to strengthen authority in Syria on a democratic basis, and to work for annexing it to Iraq as a step towards the creation of the Fertile Crescent. Thus, elections were conducted in Syria; a constitution was put for the country, and the People’s Party and National Party dominated the authority and declared in their programs unification with Iraq. America tried to obstruct the efforts of England; but it could not find an opportunity for achieving that except after assuming the authority by Adib Sheeshakli, who initially controlled the authority from behind the screens, and then openly, where he declared himself a president of the republic. Thus, Syria turned to America till 1954 when the British agents, and by the support of Iraq removed Sheeshakli; after which Syria returned to England and parliamentary rule. At that moment England started to promote the Baghdad Pact in the region.

By 1955 the region entered into violent and ferocious Anglo-American struggle. America started to use Egypt for playing the game of liberation, unity and socialism. Abdul Nasser started to plunge in struggle against the British in the name of America. So, by direction from America he concluded a deal for buying a big quantity of weapons from the communist camp, and he implied to the people he bought these weapons for attacking and eliminating (Israel). This created a huge reverberation in the entire Arab people. He also adopted Arab nationalism, and declared Egypt as an Arab state and recorded that in the constitution of the Egyptian state. He also started to call for social justice and unity. Such actions made the Arab people rally behind him, and he thus became one of the leaders of the Arab world. This was helped by the style used by America to attack England and to create confusion amongst the people of the region. So, despite the bitter enmity between America and the Soviet Union at that time, she used some styles to attract Russia into the region and make of it an international element in the region and an international factor used against England. Despite the fight of America against communism, she persuaded Jamal Abdul Nasser, the ruler of Egypt of socialism and call for it. Thus, the fact that Egypt purchased weapons from the communist camp was a factor that introduced Russia to the region. Besides, the call of Abdul Nasser to nationalism was a fundamental factor in reviving Arab nationalism after it had almost died. His adoption of socialism that developed from social justice was an effective factor in the spread of left-wing politics and making it dominate the public opinion in the region. Egypt’s adoption of attacking the foreign alliances, particularly the Baghdad Pact had great effect in removing the doubt of Nasser’s subordination to America, taking in consideration that he used to attack American colonialism. Therefore, there was no more doubt in entire Arab people that Jamal Abdul Nasser was the great saviour that was sent by Allah to this nation for delivering it from colonialism. So, all the people were devoted to him, except one group that tried to disclose him and attack him. However, their work did not make any effect, whatsoever; so he continued to have full control over the public opinion. Due to this control, the agents of England in Jordan and Iraq, as rulers, became unstable. The agents of England in Syria and Lebanon became in a very unfortunate popular position. Thus, the situation was fertile for America to work for the elimination of the British; though the region was not aware that such actions were for bringing America into the region to replace England. The region should have instead realised that their duty was to eliminate the colonialism of both states: America and England, rather than replace one of them with the other.

In this period of time some internal developments happened in Syria that were induced by the rally of the people behind Abdul Nasser. In that period the Baath Party merged with the Socialist Arab Party, which created presence in the army for the Baath party. The two parties raised the slogan of (unity, freedom and socialism) that gave them influence on authority, which they took part in. The two parties found in Abdul Nasser and his call an opportunity for making the people rally behind them and for taking obvious steps towards unity and socialism which they wanted. Thus, Syria came to be dominated by Baath party, as a way for avoiding its harm, and for fear of its imagined popularity amongst people. Therefore, Syria was with the British in reality, but it was dominated by the two ideas of unity and socialism, which had influence on the public opinion. Then Abdul Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal, which was followed by the trio aggression against Egypt that pushed the popularity of Abdul Nasser over the moon. Therefore, the British agents were scared from showing themselves on the political theatre, and their voice died down to the point that they were hardly noticed.

In August 1957 some army officers met and discussed the authority in Syria, in terms of its orientation towards the west and the infiltration of the western influence in it. So, they decided to hold the authority, but keep ruling, i.e. the president and ministers in their posts, while the army officers run the affairs and discharge ruling matters. Thus, they actually detached Syria from western colonialism. Before its detachment from the western colonialism, Syria was actually with the British, though apparently it was linked with America because the dominating thoughts were those promoted by Abdul Nasser, namely, freedom, socialism and unity. This is besides Baath party, which had the prime word in public opinion presented itself as a friend or ally to Abdul Nasser. Therefore, detachment of Syria from the west was directed against America, although in reality it was directed against the British more than the Americans. Despite that the British remained silent about this detachment and did nothing but America went crazy, and started to work with apparent nervousness for hitting the army officers and for restoring it to the domain of the west. Many attempts were undertaken in this regard but they all failed. After the failure of America in solving the problem, Abdul Nasser moved to do that. He sent Mahmud Riyadh to Syria, where he worked for making a union between Egypt and Syria, by which Egypt controls authority in Syria. Through this approach America held the rein in Syria, and she started working to expel England from Iraq and Lebanon. By 1958 the revolution in Lebanon broke out followed by the revolution of Iraq. Thus, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Egypt became in the hand of America, leaving only Jordan for the British. Abdul Nasser continued chasing England in Jordan; so it was about to be eliminated from the entire region. However, England did not despair and continued to work from its base, namely Jordan. By 1961 England had some forces that worked on its side in Syria. So, all the political forces, People’s Party, National Party and Baath Party (i.e., Baath and Arab Socialist parties) worked together against Abdul Nasser and against the unity. Thus, Syria was separated from Egypt, and the British agents assumed the authority there. America also removed Abdul Karim Qasim from the authority in Iraq after he turned away from her and worked with the communists. This resulted in an American regime controlled by the Baath party, which started to work to change the situation in Syria and Jordan for annexing them to Iraq. England became scared of that; so its agents in Damascus held a forged coup, and made Baath just a cover for the authority. In 1971, after Hafiz Asad went to Egypt and joined the four-state union he returned to Syria with a different face. He was convinced there that he can become a president to Syrian republic though he is from the Nusairiyya Alawi sect. It seemed at that time America was behind it, and it would support him as long as he worked with her. Moreover, Egypt would make its groups there support him; besides Egypt and America would work to remove the obstacles before his appointment as a president to the republic because he is an Alawi. This is because people in Syria would not accept an Alawi rather a Muslim as their president. Thus, America prepared the matter and eased the difficulties after he agreed to go along with her; so the execution of the matter started. He started to work gradually to become the president of the republic. He visited the north of Syria and conducted contacts with the masses. When he discovered that the people agree with the ruler without an apparent opposition to that, he embarked on that practically. So, Hafiz Asad was nominated for the presidency post, and the day of 12/3/1971 was assigned for referendum. Hafiz Asad became a president of Syria after that, where Syria fell again in the claws of America, and she is still till today.

These are some examples of the Anglo-American struggle in Syria, which is the most prominent aspect of it. As regarding other Arab states, Jordan remained under the control of British because 2/3 of its people are Palestinians; many of them depend on UN rations and the salaries of their sons who work outside Jordan. The other third are Bedouins from east Jordan; many of them depend on the salaries of their sons in the army. Therefore, America did not find the fertile soil she found in Syria. Thus, there was no political action in Jordan that manifests international struggle except the demonstrations that took place against the Baghdad Pact, and the fabricated coup attempt by King Hussein in 1957 in which he forged to throw some of Abdul Nasser’s agents outside the country. Therefore, Jordan is not considered to have important political actions related to political struggle, though it is one of the most important places over which there is struggle between America and England due to the amazing wealth it has under the ground and under the Dead Sea water.

As regarding Iraq, despite that Abdul Salam Arif who succeeded the Baa’thists in power had clung to Abdul Nasser’s heels the British agents from the politicians and army officers found opportunity to move. So, with little effort they controlled the army and the economic capabilities. Thus, Iraq returned back to the influence of the British. Though America returned back to Iraq at the time of Abdul Rahman Arif, but the people of the British, the Baa’thists and others dominated the authority in 1968, where the influence of the British in Iraq continued till 9/4/2003 when Iraq fell down, together with the regime of Saddam Hussein and the Baa’th power in Iraq. Since then Iraq fell under the American occupation.

As regarding Egypt; since Abdul Nasser held its power it became the major American base, and it still continues till today the important America base. There were no important political actions in it that can be part of the struggle except that which happened little after Abdul Nasser’s death. At that period there were three factors that could return Egypt back to England, which were:

Firstly: There was a weak regime in it that was unable to protect itself, not to mention filling the vacuum left by Abdul Nasser.

Secondly: Some movements emerged in Egypt within the army and the people that called for war (against Israel) and expelling the (communist) Russians and called for complete liberation.

Thirdly: There were contacts between the British and Egypt that started with the visit to Egypt by Douglas Hume, foreign minister of England, for attending the funeral of Abdul Nasser. This visit was followed by many of the British through Libya. Then these contacts became official, not only by the visit of Mohammad Hasanain Haykal, but also through official memorandums, and requesting from Egypt openly to strengthen the relations between it and England. Thus, the return of Egypt to England was only a matter of time rather than efforts, due to the unstable position of Sadat at the beginning of his authority. However, America managed to strengthen Sadat in power; and she forged the 1973 war to pave the way for peace with (Israel). This war made of Sadat a hero and helped him to take the initiative. Thus, international struggle inside Egypt disappeared, and it continued to be the most important and major American base till today.

As regarding the states of North Africa, Morocco entered under the American control when it got its independence at the time of Mohammad al-Khamis. Algeria came under American influence through Ahmad bin Bella. However, this did not last long, because Mohammad al-Khamis died and his son Al-Hasan ascended to the throne and moved with the British. Regarding Algeria, the British concocted a coup against Bin Bella with the help of King Al-Hasan and through Mohammad Khayder. So, they attracted to them Tahir Zubiri and Abu Madyan who undertook a coup that removed Ahmad Ben Bella. Thus, America was removed from Algeria, and England got the influence there. As regarding Libya and Tunisia, America could not enter any one of them, and nor generate any political actions in any one of them. Rather the British influence remained stable in them, and they did not take part in the Anglo-American struggle. As regarding Yemen and Gulf states, they all, to the exclusion of Saudi Arabia submit to the British influence. There is no struggle in the proper sense in them except in Yemen, where the British influence there is exposed to harassments from America, together with ups and downs. In Saudi Arabia, America managed to attract some the members of the royal family there, while England still has its people in the royal family as well. The Anglo-American struggle in it goes on via the personalities of the family. When Fahd bin Abdulaziz assumed the authority for example, Saudi Arabia became to proceed in the domain of the American policy. If this situation changed, where one of the people of England ascended to the throne, like Abdullah, the current Crown Prince, Hejaz and Najd will return to the British influence, and so on. America however tries since the explosions of 11/9/2001 to cement its influence in Saudi Arabia away from the fluctuation of the Royal family members, through changing the model of authority in it. The news reports show this is under study by the policy makers in Washington.

The Anglo-American struggle in the Arab countries continued ferociously during the fifties and sixties of the last century. The Palestinian issue remained the heart of this struggle. The British concluded in 1964 that there is no possibility for the region to accept a foreign state inside it, and the experiment of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine is a failure. They found it is better to establish a secular state on the model of the Lebanese state by reviving the project of the White Paper which England issued in 1939 and made it the basis for the settlement of the issue. It reviewed this with the Jewish leaders who were convinced of the idea. Bourqeebah, the leader of Tunisia undertook a visit to Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, where he presented the mentioned British plan to the Arab leaders and some of the Palestinian people. He took their agreement to the plan and thus England started its attempt for executing it. However, America through Abdul Nasser managed to frustrate the plan by its fierce opposition to it.

This shows that the ME issue was supposed to be, from an international aspect an issue of struggle between the people of the region and the colonialist states as it happened with America when she expelled colonialism and formed the USA. And as it also happened with China after World War II, where it expelled the Japanese colonialism and foreign influence, and established a communist state of a distinguished situation in the world. This is natural for every colonised country that has international and local capabilities to liberate itself from foreign influence and develop itself into a state of international weight. However, unfortunately this was not the case with the ME issue. It was rather an issue of severe struggle between America and England over the colonialism and exploitation of the region, so as to create new tight restrictions that prevent the people of the region from even thinking about liberation and emancipation. Struggle between America and England continued in the seventies and eighties of the last century, but with less force.

With the collapse of the SU at the beginning of the nineties of last century, and after the success of the American invasion to Iraq, besides her control over Kuwait and the Gulf region, the balance in the world changed. America started to draw a new map in the region, where the British would be a secondary player in the region. They were unable to struggle with America; and their level and weight declined. So, they were forced to work by using weak scheming and intrigues. They were also obliged to depend on the EU for pushing their plans that were in origin pale like the Oslo accords by which they tried to bypass America. However, America managed to change them into other courses that serve her objectives. England was also obliged to acknowledge the failure of its secular state project; so it declared its termination and accepted the American project that dictated the formation of an Arab Palestinian state besides the Jewish state. Yasser Arafat, PLO chairman officially abandoned the concept of the secular state in the Palestinian National Conference (PNC) held in Algeria in 1988. Since that date, he officially announced his acceptance of the concept of two states in all the international circles. King Hussein was also obliged to reluctantly announce the legal and administrative separation between the West Bank and the East Bank of Jordan River, and acknowledged the necessity of establishing the Palestinian State.

Thus the project of the secular state has failed officially and practically. The only project left is the American one, which is the establishment of the Palestinian state beside (Israel). This project became an international request adopted by the UN, EU, and Russia in addition to America. This international quadric group consisting of these four sides was formed to support the concept of establishing the Palestinian state beside (Israel) through the view presented by Bush -called the Road Map. America is not currently concerned, about the implementation of the Road Map (RM) because the year of 2004 was her year of elections and she wanted to use this project for only keeping the region preoccupied with it. America preoccupies the region with a project after a project till the time becomes suitable for realising her interests. At that moment the Jews will surrender to America’s command when she asks them seriously to execute her plans. This is because they cannot reject her orders if these orders were delivered seriously to them, particularly they realise America aims to fulfil her interests from these projects presented to the region, taking into consideration the interest of the Jews.

As England was forced to go along with America regarding the concept of the Palestinian state, she also went along with her in the invasion of Iraq and removal of its agent Saddam Hussein in order to preserve some of the gains that keep it as a great power by American discretion.

America also managed to push strongly her influence alongside the British influence in all the Gulf States, Yemen and Jordan. She also managed to compete with the British and French influence in North African states and Turkey. Thus, America has the true domination over the states of the ME that exceed 24 states. However, England is obliged to run behind America for obtaining some crumbs and for secretly disturbing some of her plans without daring to present openly its own plans for competing with the American plans in the region, as it used to do earlier. Therefore, it can be said that the open struggle between the two states has ended since the end of last century till today. It changed into a style of partnership and deals, crowning America as the leader of the region that has the biggest share. England, on the other side plays the role of the maid of honour so as to remain in the lime light. This is because the capability of England currently, rather the capability of the entire EU in imposing settlement plans for the region, is weak. Therefore, we see England and the EU states jump over the projects of America and work with them. Neither England and nor the EU are capable of executing anything without an effective role by America. However, we cannot say the role of England in the region has finished; rather its feeling of greatness and of being a great state still exists; besides its political shrewdness has not ceased. Moreover, its agents still have a breath, i.e. the force of England is still hidden, where it emerges from time to time.

As regarding France, it still strives to have some influence in Algeria, Tunisia and Lebanon. This is due to the presence in these states of many people educated with French culture, after it completely lost its influence in Morocco and Mauritania.

(Israel) has arranged its policies in compliance with the American interests, and it merged itself completely in these interests particularly at the time of the neoconservatives in the administration of Bush, the junior. It warmly and quickly rode the current of defending these interests. So, America protected its reputation as a great regional state in the region, and considered the defence of the existence of (Israel) as the defence of America herself; and so it remained like the spoiled child that his father does not like to annoy.

The rest of the Arab rulers went to the extreme in America’s service to the point of slavery. So, they lost any credibility they had with their people, which led them to being disdained by their (western) masters who went to the extreme in humiliating them and pressing for more concessions from them. Thus, they became easy tools in the hand of their enemy, where they replace them when they wanted, as it happened with Saddam and might happen with others. Therefore, they lost the support of their people, and remained in power by the support of their masters as well at their mercy. Their position became worse, because they became exposed to gunfire from both of their people and their master, as if they are put between the hammer of their people and the anvil of their masters. Thus, the ME region is susceptible to explosion at any time and has great likelihood for the birth of the true Islamic state; the signs of its emergence are quite obvious for the people to see.

The full book is available from Revival Publications